unitarian society of hartford

50 Bloomfield Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105
Tel: (860) 233-9897 / FAX 233-1333
Email: firstunitarian@ushartford.com

Reverend Barbara Jamestone, PhD

Home Page-
Link Central

Questions
and
Comments

 

4-22 Musical Review - continued from ushenews042607.html

OUR BEHAVIORAL COVENANT:

Ground-rules/ covenant the participants unanimously adopted to make a safe place for discussion included:

  • Be open minded
  • Speak with candor
  • Agree that we will have different views
  • Recognize that music is an integral part of worship at USH
  • Honor the traditions of USH
  • Keep “open ears” – no interrupting, or separate conversations or body language signaling closed mindedness
  • Behave respectfully—honor the speech of others

WHAT WOULD YOU MISS IN THE MUSIC IF IT WERE ELIMINATED?

  • The choir itself
  • Singing by the congregation
  • Organ prelude and postlude
  • High quality of compositions
  • Mattie
  • Children’s Blessing—the ritual of it.  Enjoy “Go Now in Peace” [written by Tom Schmutzler] as it has become part of our tradition, but primarily the ritual of the Children’s Blessing
  • The repetition of the few ritual elements in the worship
  • “Spirit of Life”   [reminds many of us of Tom S’s improvisation following the “Prayer, Meditation, Reflection” segment
  • Bach – that is, music of the highest quality, music of substance
  • Music that is traditional sacred music
  • Brass music at Easter
  • Learning new hymns – very enjoyable compared to repetition of Protestant church upbringing
  • Wow!  Today’s response of the congregation to learning the hymn from the pulpit
  • The fun of singing ourselves as members of the congregation during worship
  • Rev BJ’s interest in music and willingness to “let her rip” at the podium
  • The quality of the old masters

WHAT SHOULD BE ADDED TO THE MUSICAL REPETOIRE?

  • The choir already performs a broad range of music.  Further expanding this would require more resources.
  • Continuing to explore the hymnal
  • Other, “pure” music, for example the Renaissance polyphony – sacred music composed  1350 – 1650 --- made famous by Palestrina [1526-1594]
  • Music that would attract and retain younger people [35 years and younger, for example]
  • Music with words that would appeal to younger people
  • Certainly, don’t eliminate the rituals we have.
  • Dynamic music that inspires and lifts those who are not schooled in classical music
  • Something like General Assembly music experiences—resonating with people from diverse cultural backgrounds
  • Music to connect to other cultures in a mindful way

WHAT IS GOOD, BUT YOU WOULD OMIT TO MAKE ROOM FOR SOMETHING NEW?

  • The second anthem
  • One rather than two special music services, freeing the second for something different.
  • Anything, but not the sermon
  • One hymn
  • The length of the candle-lighting for Joys and Concerns
  • Musical call to worship
  • Postlude

OTHER COMMENTS – THAT DON’T QUITE FIT IN ABOVE CATEGORIES

  • How can we get the input from USH members not here today?
  • How can we get the input from young people?
  • Members should “not just be music auditors but be invited to join in fully”
  • “The more rarefied the music, say of Brahms, the more some may feel excluded”

MINISTERS CLOSING REMARKS

  • Perhaps we can learn whether there is any standard to aim for in the amount of music to include in worship.  [UUA, etc.]
  • My history to now has been a service lasting 1 hour and 15 minutes, and I understand that your 10 a.m. service sometimes lasted that long as well. The one hour currently allowed for worship is a discipline!
  • Maybe the two services allows us the opportunity to try something different musically. Some of us are imagining pros and cons for moving the time of the second service to 9:30, and the second service at 11 a.m.
  • Transparency in congregation about the Conversation about Music is.  Let’s ensure that everyone feels invited into the conversation, and brainstorm ways to capture all the input folks want to give.
  • We can have these conversations amicably.  It may not have happened before, but “we can do it!”

 

 

 


Let us know of any comments, errors and corrections - thanks (revised 04/26/07)